How is a business defined as 'substantially similar' to a B Bops Restaurant for the purposes of the non-compete agreement?

According to B Bops's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, a business is considered "the same as or substantially similar to a B-Bop's Restaurant" if it is involved in preparing and serving food items to the public that are standard menu items at a B Bops Restaurant.

This definition is important for franchisees because it clarifies the scope of the non-compete agreement. During the term of the Development Agreement, the developer and its related parties are prohibited from engaging in any business that is the same as or substantially similar to a B Bops Restaurant, except for the B Bops units they own and operate under a Unit Franchise Agreement. After the agreement terminates or expires, this restriction continues for two years within the Trade Area or within a 20-mile radius of any operating or under-construction B Bops Restaurant.

This means that a former B Bops franchisee could not open a restaurant that serves hamburgers, french fries, beverages, or any other items that are part of the standard B Bops menu. The non-compete aims to protect B Bops's market share and prevent franchisees from using the knowledge and experience gained while operating a B Bops franchise to directly compete with the brand. Franchisees should carefully consider this restriction before investing in a B Bops franchise, as it could limit their future business opportunities in the restaurant industry.