In Washington, what RCW chapter may supersede the Apricot Lane franchise agreement regarding termination and renewal?
Apricot_Lane Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
In the event of a conflict of laws, the provisions of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, Chapter 19.100 RCW will prevail.
RCW 19.100.180 may supersede the franchise agreement in your relationship with the franchisor including the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise. There may also be court decisions which may supersede the franchise agreement in your relationship with the franchisor including the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS (FDD pages 51–222)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Apricot Lane's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, for franchisees in Washington state, Chapter 19.100 RCW, specifically RCW 19.100.180, of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act may supersede the franchise agreement. This is particularly relevant in matters concerning the termination and renewal of the franchise agreement. This means that certain provisions within the standard Apricot Lane franchise agreement might not be enforceable if they conflict with the stipulations of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act.
This addendum ensures that Apricot Lane franchisees in Washington receive the protections afforded to them under Washington law, regardless of what the standard franchise agreement stipulates. Franchisees should be aware that the laws of their state will take precedence over conflicting terms in the franchise agreement.
Prospective Apricot Lane franchisees in Washington should carefully review Chapter 19.100 RCW to understand their rights regarding termination and renewal. They should also consult with a legal professional to ensure full comprehension of how Washington law interacts with the franchise agreement. This is a crucial step to protect their investment and ensure a clear understanding of their rights and obligations.