In Washington, what law prevails in the event of conflicting laws with the Apricot Lane franchise agreement?

According to Apricot Lane's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, Chapter 19.100 RCW, will prevail if there is a conflict of laws with the franchise agreement in Washington. This means that the specific laws and regulations outlined in the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act will take precedence over any conflicting terms in the standard Apricot Lane franchise agreement.

This protection extends to areas of termination and renewal of the franchise, where RCW 19.100.180 may supersede the franchise agreement. Additionally, court decisions may also override the franchise agreement in these areas. This ensures that franchisees in Washington are afforded the protections and rights guaranteed by Washington state law, even if the franchise agreement attempts to limit or contradict those rights.

For a prospective Apricot Lane franchisee in Washington, this addendum provides significant legal protection. It means that certain provisions in the standard franchise agreement that might be unfavorable or conflict with Washington law will not be enforceable. Franchisees should carefully review the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act to understand their rights and how they are protected under state law. It is also advisable to seek legal counsel to fully understand the implications of this addendum and how it affects their specific franchise agreement.