Does the Apricot Lane Franchisee Statement act as a release of liability under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law?

According to the 2025 Apricot Lane FDD, any representations made by the franchisee are not intended to act as a release, estoppel, or waiver of any liability incurred under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law. This means that even if a franchisee signs a statement or agreement that seems to release Apricot Lane from liability, it will not be valid concerning claims arising from Maryland's franchise law. This protection ensures that franchisees in Maryland retain their rights and legal recourse under the state's franchise regulations, regardless of any general releases they might sign.

Furthermore, any general release required as a condition of renewal, sale, or transfer of the franchise will not apply to liability under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law. This provision prevents Apricot Lane from using renewal or transfer processes to circumvent the franchisee's rights under Maryland law. The franchisee's ability to bring claims under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law remains intact even if they renew or transfer their franchise, ensuring continuous protection.

In practical terms, this means that if an Apricot Lane franchisee in Maryland believes that Apricot Lane has violated the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law, they can pursue legal action, and any prior statements or releases they signed will not prevent them from doing so. This addendum strengthens the franchisee's position by ensuring that their rights under Maryland law are fully protected and cannot be inadvertently waived through standard franchise agreements or releases.