conditional

What is the effect of the Minnesota Franchises Law on Sections 22.G and H of the Apricot Lane Franchise Agreement?

Apricot_Lane Franchise · 2025 FDD

Answer from 2025 FDD Document

If required by the Minnesota Franchises Law, Sections 22.G and H of the Franchise Agreement are deleted.

Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS (FDD pages 51–222)

What This Means (2025 FDD)

According to the 2025 Apricot Lane Franchise Disclosure Document, if required by the Minnesota Franchises Law, Sections 22.G and H of the Apricot Lane Franchise Agreement are deleted. This means that for franchises governed by Minnesota law, these sections of the agreement will not be enforced.

Without the specific text of Sections 22.G and 22.H, it is difficult to assess the precise impact of this deletion. However, the FDD indicates that these sections likely pertain to clauses that Minnesota law finds problematic or unenforceable, such as waivers of certain legal rights. By deleting these sections, Apricot Lane ensures compliance with Minnesota franchise law and protects franchisees' rights within that state.

Prospective Apricot Lane franchisees in Minnesota should carefully review the full Franchise Agreement, paying close attention to what Sections 22.G and 22.H cover. They should also consult with a franchise attorney to fully understand their rights and obligations under Minnesota law, and how this deletion affects their agreement with Apricot Lane.

Disclaimer: This information is extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document and is provided for research purposes only. It does not constitute legal or financial advice. Consult with a franchise attorney before making any investment decisions.