What claims are expressly excluded from the Apricot Lane franchise release under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law?
Apricot_Lane Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
This release expressly excludes, as applicable, any claims arising under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law or under Article 33 of the General Business Law of the State of New York or under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, RCW 19.100, and the rules adopted thereunder, and will not operate to limit or relieve any person from any liability imposed by Minnesota Statutes, sections 80C.01 or 80C.22.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS (FDD pages 51–222)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Apricot Lane FDD, the franchise release expressly excludes any claims arising under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law. This means that any general release signed by the franchisee does not apply to liabilities incurred under this specific Maryland law. This protection extends to renewals, sales, and transfers of the franchise.
This exclusion ensures that Apricot Lane franchisees in Maryland retain their rights and protections under state franchise law, even if they sign a general release. The FDD also specifies that any representations made within the franchise agreement do not act as a release, estoppel, or waiver of liability under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law.
Furthermore, the FDD clarifies that franchisees can bring actions in Maryland for claims arising under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law, regardless of any clauses specifying jurisdiction or venue. Any claims under this law must be brought within three years after the franchise is granted. This provision aims to protect franchisees by ensuring they do not unknowingly waive their rights under Maryland law when signing the franchise agreement or related documents.