Under Washington law, is a provision in the Angry Chickz Development Agreement that prohibits communication with regulators considered lawful?
Angry_Chickz Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
- 18. Prohibitions on Communicating with Regulators. Any provision in the Development Agreement or related agreements that prohibits the franchisee from communicating with or complaining to regulators is inconsistent with the express instructions in the Franchise Disclosure Document and is unlawful under RCW 19.100.180(2)(h).
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS (FDD pages 54–260)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to Angry Chickz's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, specifically the addendum for the state of Washington, any provision within the Development Agreement (or related agreements) that restricts a franchisee's ability to communicate with or complain to regulators is unlawful. This is explicitly stated as being inconsistent with the instructions in the Franchise Disclosure Document and violates RCW 19.100.180(2)(h).
For a prospective Angry Chickz franchisee in Washington, this means that any clause in their agreement that attempts to prevent them from contacting regulatory bodies is not enforceable under Washington law. The franchisee has the right to communicate with regulators without fear of reprisal or legal repercussions from Angry Chickz.
This protection is significant because it ensures franchisees can report concerns or violations to the appropriate authorities without being silenced by contractual obligations. It aligns with the broader intent of franchise laws to protect franchisees and promote fair practices within the franchise system. Franchisees should carefully review their agreements and understand their rights under Washington's Franchise Investment Protection Act.