How does the North Dakota Addendum affect the Angry Chickz Development Agreement?
Angry_Chickz Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
- 1. The provisions of this Addendum form an integral part of, and are incorporated into, the Development Agreement. This Addendum is being executed because: (A) the offer or sale of a franchise to you was made in the State of North Dakota; (B) you are a resident of the State of North Dakota; and/or (C) part or all of the Development Area is located in the State of North Dakota.
- 2. The North Dakota Securities Commissioner has held the following to be unfair, unjust, or inequitable to North Dakota franchisees (Section 51-19-09, N.D.C.C.):
- A. Restrictive Covenants: Franchise disclosure documents which disclose the existence of covenants restricting competition contrary to Section 9-08-06, N.D.C.C., without further disclosing that such covenants will be subject to this statute.
- B. Situs of Arbitration Proceedings: Franchise agreements providing that the parties must agree to arbitrate disputes at a location that is remote from the site of the franchisee's business.
- C. Restriction on Forum: Requiring North Dakota franchisees to consent to the jurisdiction of courts outside of North Dakota.
- D. Liquidated Damages and Termination Penalties: Requiring North Dakota franchisees to consent to liquidated damages or termination penalties.
- E. Applicable Laws: Franchise agreements which specify that any claims arising under the North Dakota franchise law will be governed by the laws of a state other than North Dakota.
- F. Waiver of Trial by Jury: Requiring North Dakota franchisees to consent to the waiver of a trial by jury.
- G. Waiver of Exemplary and Punitive Damages: Requiring North Dakota franchisees to consent to a waiver of exemplary and punitive damages.
- H. General Release: Requiring North Dakota franchisees to execute a general release of claims as a condition of renewal or transfer of a franchise.
- I. Limitation of Claims: Requiring that North Dakota franchisees to consent to a limitation of claims. The statute of limitations under North Dakota law applies.
- J. Enforcement of Agreement: Requiring that North Dakota franchisees to pay all costs and expenses incurred by the Franchisor in enforcing the agreement. The prevailing party in any enforcement action is entitled to recover all costs and expenses including attorney's fees.
- 3. No statement, questionnaire, or acknowledgment signed or agreed to by a franchisee in connection with the commencement of the franchise relationship shall have the effect of (i) waiving any claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or (ii) disclaiming reliance on any statement made by any Franchisor, franchise seller, or other person acting on behalf of the Franchisor. This provision supersedes any other term of any document executed in connection with the franchise.
- 4. Any capitalized terms that are not defined in this Addendum shall have the meaning given them in the Development Agreement.
- 5. Except as expressly modified by this Addendum, the Development Agreement remains unmodified and in full force and effect.
- 6. This Addendum may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which when executed and delivered shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this Addendum by electronic transmission (including an electronic signature platform or the transmission of a scanned PDF document) shall be as effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Addendum.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed, sealed and delivered this Addendum as of the Effective Date identified below.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS (FDD pages 54–260)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Angry Chickz Franchise Disclosure Document, the North Dakota Addendum modifies the Development Agreement for franchisees in North Dakota. The addendum is an integral part of the Development Agreement and is included because the franchise offer or sale was made in North Dakota, the franchisee is a resident of North Dakota, or part/all of the development area is in North Dakota.
The addendum addresses specific provisions that the North Dakota Securities Commissioner considers unfair, unjust, or inequitable to North Dakota franchisees. These include restrictive covenants, the location of arbitration proceedings, restrictions on forum, liquidated damages and termination penalties, applicable laws, waiver of trial by jury, waiver of exemplary and punitive damages, general release requirements, limitations of claims, and enforcement of agreement terms. The addendum ensures that North Dakota law prevails in these areas, superseding conflicting terms in the standard Development Agreement.
Furthermore, the addendum states that no statement, questionnaire, or acknowledgment signed by the franchisee can waive claims under North Dakota franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or disclaim reliance on statements made by Angry Chickz. Unless specifically modified by the addendum, the Development Agreement remains in full force and effect. This addendum helps to protect the rights of Angry Chickz franchisees in North Dakota by ensuring compliance with North Dakota state law.