If there is a conflict between the Angry Chickz Franchise Agreement and the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, which prevails?

According to the 2025 Angry Chickz Franchise Disclosure Document, if a conflict of laws arises, the provisions of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, chapter 19.100 RCW, will take precedence. This protection applies if the offer to sell the franchise is accepted in Washington, the purchaser is a Washington resident, or the franchised business is located or operated in Washington. This ensures that Washington franchisees receive the full protection of their state's franchise laws.

This clause is included as part of an addendum to the Angry Chickz Franchise Agreement specifically for the state of Washington. The addendum modifies the franchise agreement, and its provisions form an integral part of the agreement, superseding any conflicting terms. This addendum covers various aspects of the franchise relationship, including conflict of laws, franchisee rights, and dispute resolution processes.

For a prospective Angry Chickz franchisee in Washington, this means that the state's franchise laws offer a baseline of protection that cannot be undermined by the standard franchise agreement. Franchisees should be aware of their rights under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, particularly concerning termination, renewal, and dispute resolution. It is advisable to consult with an attorney to fully understand these rights and how they apply to the franchise agreement.