What agreement does the Angry Chickz Developer make regarding challenging the agreement in court?
Angry_Chickz Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
Franchisee and Guarantors shall file any controversy or claim whatsoever arising out of or relating to this Release or the enforcement of the promises in this Release or with regard to the interpretation, formation, or breach of this Release in the court where ANGRY CHICKZ's principal offices are located.
ANGRY CHICKZ may file any controversy or claim whatsoever arising out of or relating to this Release or the enforcement of the promises in this Release or with regard to the interpretation, formation, or breach of this Release in the court where its principal offices are located, where Franchisee resides or does business, or where the claim arose.
Source: Item 23 — RECEIPTS (FDD pages 54–260)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 Angry Chickz Franchise Disclosure Document, the franchisee and guarantors agree to file any disputes related to the release or enforcement of promises in the release, including interpretation, formation, or breach, in the court where Angry Chickz's principal offices are located. However, Angry Chickz retains the option to file such claims in the court where its principal offices are located, where the franchisee resides or does business, or where the claim arose. This indicates that while the franchisee's legal recourse is limited to a specific venue chosen by Angry Chickz, Angry Chickz has multiple options for where to file a claim.
This clause is significant for potential Angry Chickz franchisees as it restricts their ability to choose a convenient or familiar jurisdiction for resolving disputes. They must be prepared to litigate in the location of Angry Chickz's principal offices, which may increase their legal costs and logistical challenges.
It is important to note that for franchisees in Illinois and Maryland, there are addenda that may modify these venue and jurisdiction provisions to comply with state franchise laws. Specifically, the Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act voids any provision designating jurisdiction and venue outside of Illinois, although arbitration outside of Illinois is permitted. Similarly, the Maryland Franchise Law allows litigation involving claims under the Maryland Franchise Law to be brought in Federal District Court in Maryland if not subject to arbitration. Franchisees should carefully review any state-specific addenda to understand how these provisions may affect their rights.