exception

Under what conditions might ACS be unable to prohibit others from using Anago's Proprietary Marks?

Anago Franchise · 2025 FDD

Answer from 2025 FDD Document

There are no infringing uses or superior prior rights actually known to us that could materially affect your use of the Proprietary Marks. However, ACS's assertion of common law rights to Proprietary Marks does not prohibit others from using the Proprietary Marks or confusingly similar variations of the Proprietary Marks who may have established prior rights to the use of the Proprietary Marks, or confusingly similar variations of the Proprietary Marks, in the territories where neither we nor our franchisees have operated or advertised under the Proprietary Marks and that are not within the natural zone of expansion for future franchised or company-owned units, provided others do so in good faith and without actual knowledge of our existence or our franchisees' use of the Proprietary Marks. ACS would therefore be unable to prohibit the use of the Proprietary Marks by others who had prior use of the Proprietary Marks or confusingly similar variations of the Proprietary Marks at the time ACS first used them. If others establish prior rights to the Proprietary Marks in certain territories, we may be restricted in our ability to use the Proprietary Marks when expanding into those territories.

Source: Item 13 — TRADEMARKS (FDD pages 38–41)

What This Means (2025 FDD)

According to Anago's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, ACS's ability to prevent others from using Anago's proprietary marks is not absolute. ACS may be unable to stop other parties from using the marks or similar variations if those parties had already established rights to use the marks before ACS or its franchisees operated or advertised in those territories. This is contingent on the other parties acting in good faith and without knowledge of Anago's existence or its franchisees' use of the marks.

This situation typically arises in areas where Anago has not yet established a presence, either through franchised or company-owned units, and that are not within Anago's natural expansion zone. If another entity has been using the marks in such a territory prior to Anago's entry, ACS's common law rights may not be sufficient to prevent their continued use.

For a prospective Anago franchisee, this means that the strength and exclusivity of the Anago brand may vary geographically. In areas where others have pre-existing rights to similar marks, Anago's ability to enforce its trademark rights may be limited, potentially impacting brand recognition and marketing efforts in those regions. It is important for potential franchisees to understand the competitive landscape and any potential trademark conflicts in their target territories.

If others establish prior rights to the Proprietary Marks in certain territories, Anago may face restrictions on using the Proprietary Marks when expanding into those territories. This could limit Anago's growth opportunities in certain areas. Therefore, prospective franchisees should inquire about any known prior uses of similar marks in their desired territory and understand how this might affect their business.

Disclaimer: This information is extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document and is provided for research purposes only. It does not constitute legal or financial advice. Consult with a franchise attorney before making any investment decisions.