Are there any conditions under which an Alloy franchisee can terminate the Area Development Agreement?
Alloy Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
This Addendum pertains to franchises sold in the State of California and is for the purpose of complying with California statutes and regulations. Notwithstanding anything which may be contained in the body of the Area Development Agreement to the contrary, the Agreement is amended as follows:
-
- California Business and Professions Code Sections 20000 through 20043, the California Franchise Relations Act, provide rights to the franchisee concerning termination, transfer or non-renewal of a franchise. If the area development agreement contains a provision that is inconsistent with the law, the law will control.
Source: Item 17 — RENEWAL, TERMINATION, TRANSFER AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION (FDD pages 51–56)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 FDD, the Area Development Agreement for Alloy franchises sold in California is subject to the California Franchise Relations Act (Sections 20000 through 20043 of the California Business and Professions Code). This act provides franchisees with certain rights regarding termination, transfer, or non-renewal of a franchise. The FDD states that if any provision in the Area Development Agreement is inconsistent with California law, the law will take precedence. This means an Alloy franchisee in California may have termination rights as defined by California law, even if those rights are not explicitly stated or are contradicted in the Area Development Agreement.
For Alloy franchises sold in Illinois, the Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act also impacts termination rights. Specifically, sections 19 and 20 of the Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act outline the franchisee's rights upon termination and non-renewal. Additionally, any provision in the franchise agreement that designates jurisdiction or venue outside the State of Illinois is void, although arbitration may occur outside of Illinois. Furthermore, any attempt to waive compliance with the Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act or any other Illinois law is void.
For Alloy franchises in Virginia, the Virginia Retail Franchising Act restricts the franchisor's ability to cancel a franchise without reasonable cause. If any grounds for default or termination stated in the franchise agreement or area development agreement does not constitute "reasonable cause" as defined by Virginia law, that provision may not be enforceable.
For Minnesota, Minnesota law provides franchisees with certain termination and nonrenewal rights. As of the date of this Area Development Agreement, Minn. Stat. Sec. 80C.14, Subd. 3, 4 and 5 require, except in certain specified cases, that a franchisee be given 90 days notice of termination (with 60 days to cure) and 180 days notice for nonrenewal of the Area Development Agreement. Nothing in the Area Development Agreement can abrogate or reduce any of Developer's rights as provided for in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 80C, or Developer's rights to any procedure, forum, or remedies provided for by the laws of the jurisdiction.