What were the specific terms of the Consent Order that All Dogs Unleashed entered into?
All_Dogs_Unleashed Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
TION**
In the Matter of ADU Franchise limited liability company Using the trade name of All Dogs Unleashed: Administrative proceeding, filed by the State of Minnesota Department of Commerce against us following our elective report to the Department stating that, in April 2022, we violated the Minnesota Franchise Act by offering and selling a franchise in Minnesota while our application for registration, filed in December 2021, was still pending. In October 2022, we entered into a Consent Order whereby we agreed to refrain from violating the Minnesota Franchise Agreement, to offer rescission to the franchisee, and to pay a civil penalty in the amount of $
Source: Item 3 — LITIGATION (FDD page 8)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 All Dogs Unleashed Franchise Disclosure Document, the company faced an administrative proceeding initiated by the State of Minnesota Department of Commerce. This followed All Dogs Unleashed's self-report that they had violated the Minnesota Franchise Act in April 2022 by offering and selling a franchise while their registration application was still pending since December 2021.
In October 2022, All Dogs Unleashed entered into a Consent Order to resolve this issue. The terms of the Consent Order required All Dogs Unleashed to commit to refraining from further violations of the Minnesota Franchise Act.
Additionally, All Dogs Unleashed was obligated to offer rescission to the affected franchisee, essentially giving them the option to terminate their franchise agreement and receive compensation. The Consent Order also stipulated that All Dogs Unleashed pay a civil penalty of $1,000 to the State of Minnesota.