Does the All County franchisor have any pending actions other than routine litigation incidental to the business?
All_County Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
Except as provided above, the following applies to the franchisor, its predecessor, a person identified in Item 2, or an affiliate offering franchises under the franchisor's principal trademark:
- B. No such party has pending actions other than routine litigation incidental to the business that is significant in the context of the number of franchisees and the size, nature, or financial condition of the franchise system or its business operations.
Source: Item 22 — Contracts (FDD page 43)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to All County's 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document, the franchisor states that there are no pending actions against them, its predecessor, people identified in Item 2, or an affiliate offering franchises under the All County trademark, other than routine litigation incidental to the business. This routine litigation must not be significant in the context of the number of franchisees and the size, nature, or financial condition of the franchise system or its business operations.
This statement assures potential franchisees that All County is not currently facing any major legal challenges that could impact the franchise system's stability or their investment. It indicates that any ongoing lawsuits are considered routine and not substantial enough to pose a significant risk.
It is important for prospective franchisees to understand the nature of "routine litigation." While the FDD states that such litigation exists, it does not provide specifics. A potential franchisee may want to inquire about the types of routine litigation All County typically faces and how the company manages these issues. This due diligence can help a franchisee better assess the potential risks and costs associated with such legal matters.