What was the date of the Consent Order involving 360 Painting?
360_Painting Franchise · 2025 FDDAnswer from 2025 FDD Document
releases.
Governmental Actions
In the Matter of 360 Painting, LLC f.k.a. 360 Painting, Inc., and Paul Flick, Administrative Proceeding Before the Securities Commissioner of Maryland, Case No. 2015-0477, as modified by Order Modifying Consent Order dated January 4, 2017. On or about February 23, 2016, the Securities Division of the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Maryland initiated an investigation into the franchise related activities of 360 Painting, LLC and Paul Flick. On August 18, 2016, the defendants entered into a Consent Order with the Securities Commissioner, in which they agreed, without admitting or denying any of the Commissioner's statements of fact or conclusions of law, except as to the Commissioner's jurisdiction in the proceeding, (1) to immediately and permanently cease and desist from the offer and sale of franchises in violation of the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law; (2) to promptly file with the Securities Division and diligently pursue the completion of an initial application to register the 360 Painting franchise offering in Maryland; and (3) to send offers of rescission to two Maryland Franchisees, offering them the right to rescission of their 360 Painting franchise agreements and to obtain a refund of initial franchise fees. In an Order Modifying Consent Order dated January 4, 2017, the Consent Order was modified so that 360 Painting was not required to register its 360 Painting franchise offering in Maryland as long as no offers or sales of 360 Painting franchises were made in Maryland or to any Maryland residents. In the Consent Order, the Commissioner concluded that defendants had violated §§ 14-214, 14-216, 14- 228 and 14-229 of the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law by offering and selling franchises in Maryland and to Maryland residents while not registered to offer and sell franchises in Maryland and using a Franchise Disclosure Document that failed to set forth all information the Securities Division requires to be included in a Maryland registered Franchise Disclosure Document under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law and Maryland's Franchise Regulations. Specifically, the Commissioner found that, in the Franchise Disclosure Documents distributed to the Maryland Franchisees, defendants had failed to disclose the lawsuit filed by Leslie Owens Brown referenced above in Item 3. 360 Painting has corrected this error. The two Maryland Franchisees accepted the rescission offer.
In the Matter of 360 Painting, LLC, No. 20-AVC-F001, investigation by Illinois Attorney General's Office. In January 2020, the Illinois Attorney General's Office began an investigation of potential violations of the Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act by 360 Painting regarding its failure to obtain a signed Illinois amendment to the franchise agreement for Illinois franchises between April 2017 and December 2019. 360 Painting did not contest that Illinois amendments were not executed by Illinois franchisees during this period, but asserted that: (a) each Illinois franchisee received a properly registered franchise disclosure document, including an addendum to the disclosures and an amendment to the franchise agreement containing modifications required by Illinois law; and (b) because each franchisee received the required disclosures, the failure to obtain executed amendments from each franchisee could not have affected the franchisees' decision to purchase the franchise. The Illinois Attorney General asserted that because 360 Painting brought suit against an Illinois franchisee in Virginia (before unilaterally dismissing the case by filing a Motion to Non-Suit), Illinois franchisees were harmed. On May 22, 2020, 360 Painting entered into an Assurance of Voluntary Compliance ("AVC"), under which 360 Painting agreed to offer affected franchisees the opportunity to rescind their franchise agreements, make a $6,000 payment to the state, disclose the AVC in its disclosure document, and comply with the Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act in the future.
In the matter of Commonwealth of Virginia, ex. rel. State Corporation Commission v. 360 Painting, LLC, No. SEC-2020-00055, investigation by the Virginia State Corporation Commission. In 2020, the Virginia State Corporation Commission began an investigation of potential violations of the Virginia Retail Franchising Act Rules of the Virginia Administrative Code, 21 VAC 5-110-10 et seq. *the "Act"), regarding alleged failures to disclose necessary litigation, administrative, or material civil actions involving 360 Painting or Flick, in its 2017-2020 Franchise Disclosure Documents ("FDD's"). 360 Painting contested
whether the litigation was required to be included in the relevant FDD's and neither admitted nor denied the SCC's allegations. On March 2, 2021, an agreed Settlement Order was entered by the State Corporation Commission's Clerk's Office under which 360 Painting agreed to pay $10,000 in monetary penalties, $1,000 to defray costs of investigation, and agreed not to violate the Act in the future.
In The Matter of the Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation v. 360 Painting, LLC, Pro-Lift Doors Franchise, LLC, Maid Right, LLC, Handyman Pro, LLC, Kitchen Wise, LLC, Renew Crew, LLC, Rubbish Works, LLC, and Paul Flick, an individual, Administrative Proceeding Before the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation of the State of California, File Origination ID 33649, 26267, 110487, 293487, 292987, 339827, 99696, 365318, 403947, Consent Order dated November 19, 2021. In early 2021, the Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation ("Commissioner") opened an informal inquiry regarding alleged failures by defendants to disclose certain litigation, administrative, or material civil actions involving defendants in their Franchise Disclosure Documents ("FDD's") as well as related allegations of misrepresentations and omissions in connection with defendant 360 Painting, LLC's 2017 FDD and related sales activities in California. Defendants contested the Commissioner's allegations, but on November 19, 2021, the defendants elected to enter into a Consent Order with the Commissioner, in which they agreed, without admitting or denying any of the Commissioner's statements of fact or conclusions of law, (1) to immediately and permanently cease and desist from the offer and sale of franchises in violation of the California Franchise Investment Law; (2) to pay penalties of $72,500 and costs of $10,500 to the Commissioner; (3) to disgorge all initial franchise fees paid by California franchisees to defendant 360 Painting, LLC and refrain from enforcing or collecting judgments against California franchisees; (4) to disclose to the Commissioner pending and concluded governmental agency matters, pending and concluded administrative, criminal and civil actions against defendants and bankruptcies and debt discharges filed by defendants; (5) to a stop order related to the effectiveness of defendant's 2021 California applications; and (5) to a bar order against defendant Paul Flick from offering or selling franchises or filing franchise registrations in California for 36 months.
In the matter of determining whether there has been a violation of the Franchise Investment Protection Act of Washington by: 360 Painting, LLC, and In the matter of determining whether there has been a violation of the Franchise Investment Protection Act of Washington by: Pro-Lift Doors Franchise, LLC. State of Washington Department of Financial Institutions Securities Division, Order No.
Source: Item 3 — LITIGATION (FDD pages 13–18)
What This Means (2025 FDD)
According to the 2025 FDD, there are multiple consent orders involving 360 Painting. One consent order, detailed in the FDD, is dated August 18, 2016. In this order, 360 Painting agreed to cease offering and selling franchises in violation of Maryland franchise law, file an application to register its franchise offering in Maryland, and offer rescission to two Maryland franchisees.
Another consent order involving 360 Painting is dated November 19, 2021. In this order, 360 Painting agreed to cease offering and selling franchises in violation of California franchise law, pay penalties and costs totaling $83,000, disgorge initial franchise fees paid by California franchisees, and disclose governmental agency matters. Additionally, Paul Flick was barred from offering or selling franchises in California for 36 months.
Finally, a consent order dated October 4, 2022, states that 360 Painting agreed to cease and desist from any violation of RCW 19.100.170 and pay investigative costs of $2,000. Another consent order dated April 19, 2023, states that 360 Painting agreed to cease and desist from the offer and sale of franchises in violation of the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law and to pay a civil monetary penalty of $50,000.